SPECIAL REPORT: Amendment 4 to cost over 260,000 jobs, study says
By Ryan Houck
Business, civic and labor leaders gathered in Tallahassee recently to hear the report of a top Florida economist indicating that Amendment 4—a proposed re-write of our state constitution—would lead to massive job loss.
With unemployment nearing 12 percent, that’s the last thing Florida needs.
Tony Villamil, founder of The Washington Economics Group (WES), which conducted the study, reported that "Amendment 4’s passage will have potentially devastating consequences to Florida’s economy at a time when the economic situation at both the state and national levels is uncertain and at a time when attracting new businesses to Florida is essential for the future recovery and prosperity of the state and its residents."
The WES study indicates that Amendment 4 will lead to severe job loss in numerous sectors of Florida’s already struggling economy as well as have major impacts on Florida’s “economic dynamism,” ultimately causing a “steady decline in the standard of living for all Florida residents.” The resulting economic gridlock would erode Florida’s tax base, forcing state and local governments to either “raise taxes or cut services.”
The impacts of Amendment 4 would not be limited to a few sectors of our economy. According to the WES study, the negative impacts of Amendment 4 would “affect the whole economy of Florida.” In particular, efforts to diversify Florida’s economy by attracting “high-wage and high-skill jobs” would be jeopardized.
Florida Chamber of Commerce president Mark Wilson summed up the situation pointedly: "If you like the recession, you’ll love Amendment 4."
The gathering in Tallahassee also reflected an unprecedented show of unity, as labor and business leaders agreed to jointly oppose Amendment 4.
"It’s not too often that a union leader and a business leader agree on something," said Frank Ortis, President of the Florida State Council of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. "But we can all see how much Amendment 4 would hurt Florida’s working families. And we are working together to defeat it."
If Amendment 4 is adopted in November, Florida would become the guinea pig for a measure that has never passed in any other state in the country. However, Floridians are beginning to hear the story of St. Pete Beach, a small Florida town that adopted a local version of Amendment 4 in 2006. Since then, the town has seen fewer jobs, higher tax rates and endless litigation at taxpayer expense. Former St. Pete Beach Mayor Ward Friszolowski was in Tallahassee to hear the major economic announcement.
"Our experiment in Amendment 4 has turned St. Pete Beach into a battleground for special interests," said Friszolowski. "And at a time of economic hardship, it has caused extraordinary damage to our economy. I ask the voters of Florida to learn more about St. Pete Beach—and to learn from our mistakes. Amendment 4 supporters promise that they’ll give you a ’say on growth.’ Don’t believe it. Don’t let them do to Florida what they already did to my hometown."


March 9th, 2010 at 12:11 pm
It would have been useful if this article explained what Amendment 4 entails. At the very least a link to where it is published. Otherwise, this just contributes to the ignorance of the electorate, “It’s bad but I don’t know why”.
March 9th, 2010 at 4:56 pm
Amendment 4 is a proposed amendment to the Florida Constitution. It will appear on the 2010 ballot this November. Amendment 4, if passed, would impose a referendum requirement on all local comprehensive plan changes. Voters would be expected to vote on all technical land-use planning amendments every year.
I encourage you to visit florida2010.org to learn why we and dozens of other organizations across the state are opposed to Amendment 4.
In my experience it always helps when someone brings it home and tells me how it will impact me right here in Lakeland.
If 4 had passed in 2004 Lakeland residents would have been asked to vote on 108 comprehensive land changes over the last five years. These comp changes would most likely have been voted on in special elections. Every election held in the City of Lakeland cost taxpayers $45,000 and every county-wide election costs County $250,000. Who pays for that? Taxpayers.
Voter turnout in the past two Lakeland municipal elections was dismal. Only 8.1% of Lakeland voters turned out for the January special election, and only 16.6% voted in the December 2009 run-off election. The general municipal election resulted in a 19.5% turnout. Lakeland residents were choosing their next mayor in the November and December elections and at best only 19.5% showed up to participate. Can you imagine how little interest there will be when Lakeland voters are asked to vote on all comprehensive land-use changes?
If voters don’t presently go to the polls to vote for the elected officials that are currently responsible for making land-use changes to our comprehensive plans, why do we think they would go to the polls to vote for the comp changes themselves?
We will continue to post updates and further information regarding the devastating impacts Amendment 4 will cause. Stay tuned…
March 9th, 2010 at 5:33 pm
I found the link to the State of Florida’s Election website with the full text: http://election.dos.state.fl.us/initiatives/fulltext/pdf/37681-2.pdf
I appreciate the Chamber of Commerce’s position on this, but I also see the other side. Having all the information always leads to a better decision.
Apathy on the part of the electorate doesn’t mean we should abandon democracy. But I agree, this amendment could become giant burden and prove no better in protecting our community.